Evaluating partnership and impact in the first year of the Winchester Student Fellows Scheme

Stuart Sims, Savannah King, Tom Lowe, Yassein El-Hakim


This article analyses the outputs of an institutional approach to student engagement that created sixty staff-student partnership opportunities aiming to enhance the learning experience. The Student Fellows Scheme awarded bursaries to students in return for co-leading a project in the broad area of educational development. The projects could be evaluations, research projects or interventions. This paper describes a systematic review of the final outputs of the Student Fellow projects and depicts the extent of staff-student partnerships and the impact of the scheme, demonstrating that the majority of projects are programme-focused, with students as the main beneficiaries. Whilst a key motivation of this review was to analyse the extent of staff-student partnerships, the lack of reference to partnership in many reports illustrated the limitations of the methodology. This review has facilitated a reorganisation of the scheme and developed a structure for continuing analysis of it into the future.


student engagement; partnership; educational development; Student Fellows Scheme; student voice

Full Text:



Astin, A. (1999) ‘Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education.’ Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A. and Felten, P. (2011) ‘Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: implications for academic developers.’ International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2011.568690 (Accessed: 28 November 2014).

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985) ‘The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality.’ Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6 (Accessed: 13 February 2015).

Elmore, R. F. (2003) ‘A plea for strong practice.’ Educational Leadership, 62(3), 6-10.

Finn, J. D. (1989) ‘Withdrawing from school.’ Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.

Gronn, P. (2002) ‘Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis.’ The leadership quarterly, 13(4), 423-451. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00120-0 (Accessed: 15 February 2015).

Healey, M., Flint, A. and Harrington, K. (2014) Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.

Kandiko, C. B. and Mawer, M. (2013) Student Expectations and Perceptions of Higher Education. London: King’s Learning Institute.

Kuh, G. D. (2005) ‘Student engagement in the first year of college.’ In: L. M. Upcraft, J. N. Gardner and B. O. Barefoot, Challenging and supporting the first-year student, 86-107. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kuh, G. D. (2007) ‘What student engagement data tell us about college readiness.’ peerReview, 9(1). Available at: https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/what-student-engagement-data-tell-us-about-college-readiness (Accessed: 13 February 2015).

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H. and Whitt, E. J. (2005) Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kuh, G. D., Nelson Laird, T. F. and Umbach, P. D. (2004) ‘Aligning faculty and student behavior: Realizing the promise of Greater Expectations.’ Liberal Education, 90(4), 24-31.

Lawson, M. A. and Lawson, H. A. (2013) ‘New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice.’ Review of Educational Research, 83, 432-479. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891 (Accessed: 13 February 2015).

National Union of Students [NUS] (2012) A manifesto for partnership, p.8. Available at: http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/a-manifesto-for-partnership/ (Accessed: 13 January 2016).

National Union of Students [NUS/HSBC] (2011) Student Experience Full Report. London: NUS.

Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000) ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.’ American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68 (Accessed: 13 February 2015).

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R. and Diamond, J. B. (2001) ‘Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective.’ Educational researcher, 30(3), 23-28. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189x030003023 (Accessed: 13 February 2015).

Streeting, W. and Wise, G. (2009) Rethinking the values of higher education - consumption, partnership, community? Gloucester: QAA.

The Student Engagement Partnership (2014) The Principles of Student Engagement:

The Student Engagement Conversation. London: TSEP.

Trowler, V. and Trowler, P. (2010) Student engagement evidence summary. York: HEA.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v2i1.257


  • There are currently no refbacks.